Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11137 12
Original file (11137 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

BUG
Docket No: 11137-12
4 December 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ow ears acm.
a_i (RECONSIDERATION)

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(b) SECNAVINST 1910.4B
(c) 10 U.S.C. 654 (Repeal)

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) BCNR dec doc BUG, docket #: 13989-90 dtd 16 Apr 92
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, a former enlisted member
of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his general characterization of service discharge
issued on 4 December 1987 due to “Homosexuality” be upgraded to
a fully honorable characterization of service. He also
requested that his separation code “GRA” (Homosexuality) be
changed to “JFF” (Secretarial Authority), that his reentry code
of RE-4 (Not Recommended for Retention) be changed to RE-1Jd
(Recommended for Retention), and that his narrative reason for
separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority” per reference
(b). On 2 June 1992, this Board upgraded his original other
than honorable (OTH) characterization of service to general,
because it found that he had an otherwise unblemished service
record and concluded the discharge characterization was too
harsh (enclosure (2)).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, Dixit and
Whalen, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 4 December 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the limited corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although enclosure (1) was not filed in a timely manner,
it is in the interest of justice to waive the statute of
limitations and review the application on its merits.

c. Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy on 8 July 1985 after
serving more than four years of prior honorable service. He was
not the subject of any disciplinary action during his final
enlistment.

dad. During April 1987, the Naval Investigative Service began
investigating Petitioner, who was serving as an AG2 (pay grade
E-5), for alleged homosexual acts with another male Sailor
serving as an AG3 (pay grade E-4). The investigation was
prompted by Petitioner’s former male roommate, an AG2, coming
forward after witnessing Petitioner and the AG3 in homosexual
conduct in their barracks room.

e. On 10 August 1987, Petitioner was notified that he was
being administratively separated due to homosexuality. He chose
to have his case heard by an administrative discharge board
(ADB). The ADB recommended that he be discharged with an OTH
characterization of service due to homosexuality. The discharge
authority concurred with the ADB’s recommendation, and on 4
December 1987, he was discharged with an OTH characterization of
service due to homosexuality and assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
On 2 June 1992, this Board upgraded his OTH characterization of
service to general.

f. Reference (c) sets forth the Department of the Navy’s
policies, standards, and procedures for correction of military
records following the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) repeal of
10 U.S.C. 654. It also provides service discharge review boards
with the authority to grant requests to change the narrative
reason for discharge to “Secretarial Authority” when the
original discharge was based solely on DADT or a similar policy
in place prior to enactment of it and there are no aggravating
factors in the record, such as misconduct. Aggravating
circumstances may include a service member engaging ina
homosexual act with a subordinate in a situation that violates
customary superior-subordinate relationships, and in a location
subject to naval control that has an adverse impact on

2
discipline, good order, or morale comparable to the impact of
such activity aboard a vessel or aircraft.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of reference (c), the Board concludes that
Petitioner’s request warrants partial favorable action in the
form of relief.

The Board finds there were aggravating factors in Petitioner’s
homosexual act in that it occurred with a subordinate in his
barracks room, which was witnessed by his roommate. Based on
this aggravation, the Board finds no basis to upgrade his
general characterization of service. However, in light of the
repeal of “Don’t ask, don’t tell”, the Board finds that his
separation code should be changed to “JFF”, his reentry code
should be changed to “RE-1J3”, and his narrative reason for
separation should be changed to “Secretarial Authority”. In
view of the above, the Board directs the following limited
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing
his separation code to “JFF” vice “GRA”, his narrative reason
for separation to “Secretarial Authority” vice “Homosexuality”,
and his reentry code to “RE-1J” vice “RE-4”" on 4 December 1987,
all now of record.

b. That this Report of Proceedings not be filed in
Petitioner’s record.

c. That no further relief be granted.
d. That, upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs

be informed that Petitioner's application was received by the
Board on 17 October 2012.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ion Brorgt

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

LVR

W. DEAN PFE
Executive dikéc

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11673 12

    Original file (11673 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her narrative reason for separation “Homosexuality” be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 December 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5584 14

    Original file (NR5584 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. The Board concludes that based upon his overall record of service, and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b), that relief in the form of his narrative reason for separation be changed to “secretarial authority,” SPD code be changed to “JFF1,” and reentry code be changed to “RE-1J.” Additionally, that the separation authority be changed to read “MILPERSMAN 1910-164.” The Board is not willing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2455-13

    Original file (NR2455-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former officer of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this - Board requesting, in effect, that her characterization of service, “Under Honorable Conditions”, be changed per reference (b). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that the narrative reason for separation was “secretarial authority”, that her SPD code be changed to “JFF” vice “GLC”,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04486

    Original file (BC-2011-04486.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After considering all the evidence, the board found that she did commit homosexual acts and recommended she be separated with an honorable discharge. Her discharge from the Air Force was legally sufficient based on current policy at the time of her discharge making her narrative reason for separation an appropriate reason for discharge. Therefore, the Board majority recommends the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7167 13

    Original file (NR7167 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service assigned on 19 November 1983 be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Bey, and Clemmons, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2436-13

    Original file (NR2436-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former officer of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board _ requesting, in effect, that her characterization of service - “Under other than honorable (OTH) conditions", narrative reason for separation, “homosexual conduct”, Separation Program Designator (SPD) “HRB”, and “RE-4” {not recommended for retention) reentry code, be changed per reference (b). It provides service Discharge Review Boards with the authority to grant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06394-12

    Original file (06394-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 06394-12 2 July 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF (hei Ref: (a) 19 U.8.¢. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his narrative reason for separation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01318-11

    Original file (01318-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 1318-11 8 November 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF qe Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. McBride and Whalen, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 November 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5258 14

    Original file (NR5258 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his separation authority of “Marine Corps Separation Manual (MARCORSEPMAN) parlagraph] 6207.3b(2)” (homosexual admission), separation code of “HRAI1” (homosexual admission), reenlistment code of RE-4 (not recommended...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00227-12

    Original file (00227-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his “RE-4” (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 September 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...